Return to Resources to help us rethink the current crisis (in perception)
Greetings, I hope that you are doing well.
I am writing this e-mail in response to the Grubhub for Drivers: COVID-19 Information Web page located at https://driver-support.grubhub.com/hc/en-us/categories/360002855511-COVID-19.
There are some things that I feel need to be pointed out:
- The CDC has not ever proved the existence of the “SARS-CoV-2 virus” (“coronavirus”) through proper isolation and purification techniques. Please see https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/ for more information.
- There are another 189 institutions around the world that said in response to either court orders and/or FOIA requests that they do not have records confirming the existence of the “SARS-CoV-2 virus” (“coronavirus”) through proper isolation and purification techniques. Please see https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/ for more information.
- Even if someone one day successfully proves that “viruses” do actually exist, it has not ever been proven that germs cause “dis-ease”.
- Since “viruses” don’t exist, why does the CDC and Grubhub recommend that people wear protective covering over their faces? It is important to note that although “viruses” don’t exist that they are considered to be nanoparticles. It has already been demonstrated that nanoparticles do enter our bodies through our millions of pores on our skin. Thus, how could any protective covering over our nostrils and mouth protect us from nanoparticles entering our body through our skin in other areas, nails, and/or hair follicles?
- Lastly, I am enclosing various documents that I have created that provide resources, quotes, and more questions about the fallacy of face coverings, the “germ theory of disease causation”, and vaccinations, including the current set of “COVID-19” jabs:
https://www.questionuniverse.com/face-hiding.html
Face Hiding For No Legitimate Reason (No “Coronavirus” Has Been Proven to Exist}
Irucka Embry
https://www.questionuniverse.com/germs-disease-fraud.html
Germs Can Not & Do Not Cause Dis–ease: The “germ theory of disease causation” is a Fraud
Irucka Embry
https://www.questionuniverse.com/vaccination.html
COVID-19 Vaccination/Experimental Gene Therapy & What You Are Not Being Told (This is Just the “Tip of the Iceberg”)
Irucka Embry
Thank you in advance for your time and consideration.
Irucka Embry
No fear, Only Love!
—Irucka Ajani Embry, 15 March 2020
“With the increased use of therapeutic serums in the past twenty years, much has been written of the various manifestations of anaphylaxis. Urticaria, arthralgia, adenopathy and cardiac collapse are well known complications of serum therapy. Coma and occasionally death have been reported following serum injection. Many reports of multiple neuritis and myelitis following the use of Pasteur treatment have appeared, and encephalitis following vaccination is well known. Another unpleasant complication of prophylactic efforts, and fortunately one less frequently seen, is multiple neuritis.”
—George Wilson, M.D. and Samuel B. Hadden, M.D., Neuritis and Multiple Neuritis Following Serum Therapy, JAMA. 1932;98(2):123-125, January 9, 1932, https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/1153665 . Also archived at https://archive.vn/Nw4nq
“If virulent germs were normal in the atmosphere, how numerous would be the occasions for their penetration independently by way of the lungs and intestinal mucus! There would not be a wound, however slight, the prick even of a pin, that would not be the occasion for infecting us with smallpox, typhus, syphilis, gonorrhoea.”
—Professor Béchamp, as quoted in Béchamp or Pasteur?: A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology By Ethel D. Hume on Page 308 [prefaced by Pasteur: Plagiarist, Imposter: The Germ Theory Exploded By R. B. Pearson]; ISBN# 978-1-46790-012-6, 2011
“The general public, however intelligent, are struck only by that which it takes little trouble to understand. They have been told that the interior of the body is something more or less like the contents of a vessel filled with wine, and that this interior is not injured — that we do not become ill, except when germs, originally created morbid, penetrate into it from without, and then become microbes.
“The public do not know whether this is true; they do not even know what a microbe is, but they take it on the word of the master; they believe it because it is simple and easy to understand; they believe and they repeat that the microbe makes us ill without inquiring further, because they have not the leisure — nor, perhaps, the capacity — to probe to the depths that which they are asked to believe.”
—Professor Béchamp, preface to La Théorie du Microzyma, as quoted in Béchamp or Pasteur?: A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology By Ethel D. Hume on Page 304 [prefaced by Pasteur: Plagiarist, Imposter: The Germ Theory Exploded By R. B. Pearson]; ISBN# 978-1-46790-012-6, 2011
“There is an implication to be found in the statement of Surgeon Verneuil, though probably not meant by him, to which assent must be given when understood. It is TRUE that there is no such THING as tetanus, small pox. syphilis, etc., as is implied by the general use of nosological terms. Disease is not a thing, an entity: it is a condition, and the error of regarding the condition of disease as an entity has confirmed, where it has not originated, much of the prevailing erroneous treatment of the sick.
“Nosological terms have a use; it is that of bringing to the mind of the physician a group of pathological symptoms, which may or may not be present in the case of the patient under consideration; from them, when present, the diseased condition of the patient can be recognized and treated. Unfortunately, through not understanding this truth, attempts are frequently made to treat, not the patient, but the name, which has been given to a collection of morbid symptoms.
“A broken limb is a thing; the inflammation which results from it is a condition, and if gangrene ensues the gangrene is not a thing, but a condition to be taken into consideration with all the other symptoms in the treatment of the patient. The surgeon, Verneuil, had probably a glimmering perception of this truth, but he misapplied it, for his theory and practice, as a physician, and the theory and practice of nearly all modern medicine assume that the condition to be treated is a thing having a name and this name is treated instead of the patient.”
—Montague R. Leverson, The Blood and its Third Anatomical Element (http://www.whale.to/v/bechamp_b1.html) by Antoine Bechamp, 1912, Translated by Montague R. Leverson, [WHALE Oct 2005]
