Return to Resources to help us rethink the current crisis (in perception)
I submitted the following comment to the moderator at GMO Science for the article below; however, GMO Science chose not to accept nor publish my comment. I guess that my questioning the “golden calf” of Fake Science is too much for that organization. I also guess that my showing that all vaccinations/inoculations are harmful and not just the current crop of experimental gene therapy jabs was too much for them too. So much for “scientific inquiry” and the other high ideals that we have been bamboozled with regarding science.
GMO Science: Pediacide — An editorial by Drs. Seneff and Perro, July 15, 2021
Drs. Seneff and Perro, thank you for writing this important article.
I would like to make some additional points. I am beginning my comments with some useful quotes (“food for thought”):
“All is danger in this kind of experimentation, for the reason that it is not anything inert that is acted upon, but that there is a modification, more or less injurious, of the microzymas of the inoculated.”
—Les Microzymas By Antoine Béchamp, Page 902. As quoted in Béchamp or Pasteur?: A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology By Ethel D. Hume on Page 338 [prefaced by Pasteur: Plagiarist, Imposter: The Germ Theory Exploded By R. B. Pearson]; ISBN# 978-1-46790-012-6, 2011
“The Danger of Inoculating
“Formerly, notwithstanding the generally ignorant use of drugs by the medical profession, the efforts of the physician, mistaken though they generally were, were really directed exclusively to heal the sick. From the time of Pasteur’s predecessor in quackery —Ed. Jenner—and during the growth of Pasteur’s superstition right down to this day, the efforts of the large majority of the profession and of all the official doctors, except those officially employed in promoting sanitation, have been and are engaged in efforts to make sick the well. By poisonous sera of all sorts they pretend to seek to protect the well against diseased conditions which would scarcely ever happen to them were their vitality not reduced by poison poured into their blood, whereby their vitality is lowered and their constitutions often permanently debased. Let me call attention to the folly of all these inoculations.
“When a drug is administered by the mouth, as was beautifully pointed out by Dr. J. J. Garth Wilkinson, in proceeding along the alimentary canal, it encounters along its whole line a series of chemical laboratories, wherein it is analysed, synthesized, and deleterious matter prepared for excretion, and finally excreted, or it may be ejected from the stomach, or overcome by an antidote. But when Nature’s coat of mail, the skin, is violated, and the drug inserted beneath the skin, Nature’s line of defence is taken in the rear and rarely can anything be done to hinder or prevent the action of the drug, no matter how injurious, even fatal, it may be. All the physicians of the world are incompetent either to foresee its action or to hinder it. Even pure water has been known to act as a violent and foudroyant poison when injected into the blood stream. How much more dangerous is it, then, to inject poisons known to be such, whether modified in the fanciful manner at present fashionable among Vivisectionists, or in any other manner. These simple considerations show that inoculation should be regarded as malpractice, to be tolerated only in case of extreme danger where the educated physician sees no other chance of saving life.”
—Pasteur the Plagiarist: The Debt of Science to Béchamp by Dr. Montague R. Leverson, 1911. Delivered at Claridges Hotel, London, England on May 25, 1911, Pages 11-13 [https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015081399316&view=1up&seq=1]
… “The restriction is the scarcity of highly specialized raw materials needed to produce our vaccine. These 280 different materials or components are produced by many suppliers in 19 different countries.” …
—Today I Sent This Letter To Have a Candid Conversation With Our Colleagues About the Drivers of COVID-19 Access and Availability By Albert Bourla, Published on May 7, 2021 [https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/today-i-sent-letter-have-candid-conversation-our-drivers-bourla/. Also archived at https://archive.st/archive/2021/9/www.linkedin.com/iduu/www.linkedin.com/pulse/today-i-sent-letter-have-candid-conversation-our-drivers-bourla/index.html]
“Most existing influenza vaccines are produced by growing the virus in eggs. This is a time-honored, but time-consuming process. Furthermore, the vaccine undergoes a process of adaptation to grow in eggs that may in itself lead to mutations that make the resulting vaccine less effective. In recognition of these limitations, the President signed the “Executive Order on Modernizing Influenza Vaccines in the United States to Promote National Security and Public Health” on September 19, 2019. Broadly, the Executive Order directs BARDA, CDC, NIH, and FDA to accelerate the adoption of improved influenza vaccine technologies. In alignment with the goals of the Executive Order, NIAID is conducting and supporting research to develop state-of-the-art vaccine platform technologies that could be used to develop universal influenza vaccines as well as to improve the speed and agility of the influenza vaccine manufacturing process. These platform technologies include DNA, messenger RNA (mRNA), virus-like particles, vector–based, and self–assembling nanoparticle vaccines. For example, NIAID–supported scientists are investigating an mRNA vaccine candidate that would allow for a more rapid and flexible response to both seasonal and pandemic influenza than do existing vaccine production strategies.”
—Anthony S. Fauci, M.D., The Role of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in Research on Influenza Vaccine Innovation Testimony before the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology {https://science.house.gov/imo/media/doc/Fauci%20Testimony.pdf — [Requires PDF Software] }
1) It is more than genetically engineered ingredients in the present and future “vaccines”. It is also the possible presence of hydrogels, {para}magnetic particles, quantum dots, nanotechnology (including, but not limited to, nanochips, nanorobots, and/or self-assembling nanoparticles), etc.
I have collected various links on those technologies and they are available from the link below (There are also numerous quotes, questions, and other links available in the document too):
https://www.questionuniverse.com/vaccination.html
COVID-19 Vaccination/Experimental Gene Therapy & What You Are Not Being Told (This is Just the “Tip of the Iceberg”)
By Irucka Embry
That document is also available on both my ResearchGate (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Irucka-Embry) and Academia (https://independent.academia.edu/IruckaEmbry) profiles.
2) Due to a FOIA lawsuit against the US FDA filed by the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (https://phmpt.org), thousands of documents from Pfizer/the FDA will be released to the general public this year. One of the early documents released covered the monitoring period from December 2020 - February 2021. In that short time period, Pfizer was aware of the deaths of 1,223 people. In the document’s appendix, there was a listing of 1,291 adverse events that Pfizer was monitoring for in the vaccine adverse events databases. I have taken those adverse events and known adverse events from 5 other resources and placed them in the jab.adverse.reactions (https://cran.r-project.org/package=jab.adverse.reactions) package using the R programming language (https://www.r-project.org/). Please refer to the CITATION.cff file (https://gitlab.com/iembry/jab.adverse.reactions/-/blob/master/CITATION.cff) for the complete citations of the reference sources.
I have the full data, for non-R users, available in three formats: CSV, JSON, and XML. Please see the relevant links below:
ResearchGate: Possible Vaccine/Experimental Gene Therapy Adverse Events in CSV format
Thank you.
Irucka Embry, E.I.T.
